While I agree in principle, Singapore and South Korea has very similar characteristics (low birthrate, slowing growth, male only conscription, etc) but Singapore is no where near South Korea's level of misogyny. I think something has to be said laws which do not nearly protect women as much as it is needed.
Eventually, over generations of male supremacy, any gradual move towards equality will feel like unfairness to South Korean men. South Korea is in a really big pickle.
Won't a declining population solve some of these problems? Intense competition for schools and housing seems like it'd decrease if population actually does crater; there's just less people to compete with
This is quite disturbing. I hope our floor in the west/U.S. isn’t this low, but nothing I’ve seen in the immediate aftermath from last Tuesday makes me confident about that.
I am not going to argue about sexual harassment that is pretty gross, but saying women rightly reacted to this because of misogyny is retarded, just like blaming the issue on men being fascistic? (Surely you don't even know what fascism means).
Like in most of the west women say the system is misogynistic and harms them when in reality it is very misandristic and advantages women. On dv i disagree, it takes you like a few minutes to ask some ai about dv rates and it shows that women even in arab countries commit more dv, physical, sexual and psychological than men, of lower to average gravity but they do.
Men inhibit themselves with the gfs or wives women dishibit themselves with their bfs or husbands.
Also i have read that women also begin to accuse men of rape or harassment when they are innocent, obv rape should be punished with death and sexual harassment with jail, but women report your for staring at them or not doing anything.
That part about women being 20% of the legislature is dumb, it may be that way because men are simply better at politics, in all western countries there are quotas that impose like 40% of women on electoral lists or in the parliament, or there is pressure to put women in charge, man, it is obvious that if they had to make laws that equalize male-female representation even when women have the same rights and opportunities then men are doing a lot better at the top.
Your post screams some femcelish anger (that is not that far from incel rage)
“Women don’t want to sacrifice their hard-earned careers for a family, and will in fact sacrifice the family for work (which I don’t really get but whatever).”
What do you mean by this? The Alice Evans post you linked talks about a lot of the same SK trends you discuss, but in re-reading I didn’t see explicit discussion of “sacrificing family for work.” And furthermore, if that sacrifice is happening, what’s not to “get” about it?
While I agree in principle, Singapore and South Korea has very similar characteristics (low birthrate, slowing growth, male only conscription, etc) but Singapore is no where near South Korea's level of misogyny. I think something has to be said laws which do not nearly protect women as much as it is needed.
Eventually, over generations of male supremacy, any gradual move towards equality will feel like unfairness to South Korean men. South Korea is in a really big pickle.
1 Birth per 1000 women??
Won't a declining population solve some of these problems? Intense competition for schools and housing seems like it'd decrease if population actually does crater; there's just less people to compete with
The competition is relative to other people, so no.
This is quite disturbing. I hope our floor in the west/U.S. isn’t this low, but nothing I’ve seen in the immediate aftermath from last Tuesday makes me confident about that.
I am not going to argue about sexual harassment that is pretty gross, but saying women rightly reacted to this because of misogyny is retarded, just like blaming the issue on men being fascistic? (Surely you don't even know what fascism means).
Like in most of the west women say the system is misogynistic and harms them when in reality it is very misandristic and advantages women. On dv i disagree, it takes you like a few minutes to ask some ai about dv rates and it shows that women even in arab countries commit more dv, physical, sexual and psychological than men, of lower to average gravity but they do.
Men inhibit themselves with the gfs or wives women dishibit themselves with their bfs or husbands.
Also i have read that women also begin to accuse men of rape or harassment when they are innocent, obv rape should be punished with death and sexual harassment with jail, but women report your for staring at them or not doing anything.
That part about women being 20% of the legislature is dumb, it may be that way because men are simply better at politics, in all western countries there are quotas that impose like 40% of women on electoral lists or in the parliament, or there is pressure to put women in charge, man, it is obvious that if they had to make laws that equalize male-female representation even when women have the same rights and opportunities then men are doing a lot better at the top.
Your post screams some femcelish anger (that is not that far from incel rage)
“Women don’t want to sacrifice their hard-earned careers for a family, and will in fact sacrifice the family for work (which I don’t really get but whatever).”
What do you mean by this? The Alice Evans post you linked talks about a lot of the same SK trends you discuss, but in re-reading I didn’t see explicit discussion of “sacrificing family for work.” And furthermore, if that sacrifice is happening, what’s not to “get” about it?