AI 2027 wasn't a "document that Sam Altman shopped around to DC policymakers to support his company" It's a forecast-as-narrative produced by AI safety-adjacent researchers who believe transformative AI is imminent and want policymakers and the wider public to take that possibility seriously. The lead author, Daniel Kokotajlo, left OpenAI over safety disagreements and refused to sign a non-disparagement agreement; his relationship with OpenAI is adversarial, not promotional. The misattribution comes up several times in the piece. I'd encourage you to include some corrections flagging this
I wish we could talk more about the difference between China and America's approach to AI. America is going the proprietary approach while China is going Open Source. They are also spending 100 billion to our 600 billion on AI infrastructure.
AI 2027 wasn't a "document that Sam Altman shopped around to DC policymakers to support his company" It's a forecast-as-narrative produced by AI safety-adjacent researchers who believe transformative AI is imminent and want policymakers and the wider public to take that possibility seriously. The lead author, Daniel Kokotajlo, left OpenAI over safety disagreements and refused to sign a non-disparagement agreement; his relationship with OpenAI is adversarial, not promotional. The misattribution comes up several times in the piece. I'd encourage you to include some corrections flagging this
I wish we could talk more about the difference between China and America's approach to AI. America is going the proprietary approach while China is going Open Source. They are also spending 100 billion to our 600 billion on AI infrastructure.
Such a great read, I really liked the Magdalena Bay references lol